118 S.E. 923
11268Supreme Court of South Carolina.
July 16, 1923.
Before BOWMAN, J., Spartanburg, September, 1922. Affirmed.
Action by C.A. Murph against Clifton Manufacturing Co. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
In this case a printed form of chattel mortgage was used with blanks in which had been inserted in writing the name of the mortgagee, the kinds of crops covered, the number of acres and the name of the farm and of the lands bounding it.
Messrs. Bomar, Osborne Brown, for appellant, cite:“Description of property” defined: 100 S.C. 18.
Messrs. Perrin Tinsley, for respondent, cite: Case governed by 87 S.C. 535.
July 16, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.
It is only necessary to cite the case of State v. Perry, 87 S.C. 535; 70 S.E., 304, to show that the appeal herein cannot be sustained.
Affirmed.
Page 244